<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Ui on Personal Site of Tim Child</title>
    <link>/tags/ui/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Ui on Personal Site of Tim Child</description>
    <generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 11:58:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    
	<atom:link href="/tags/ui/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    
    
    <item>
      <title>Hilarious look at Adobe’s UI</title>
      <link>/2009/01/29/hilarious-look-at-adobes-ui/</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 11:58:46 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>/2009/01/29/hilarious-look-at-adobes-ui/</guid>
      <description>So what&amp;#8217;s wrong with Adobe&amp;#8217;s UI: Well this is a very funny tumbl log of plenty of comments of things that could be done better:
[http://adobegripes.tumblr.com/
]1
Things that particularly standout are issues with there cross-platform UI. Although praised by many as a good example, it just shows that some of the finer details are missed.
Via UIEye.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>UI design in the open</title>
      <link>/2009/01/19/ui-design-in-the-open/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 11:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>/2009/01/19/ui-design-in-the-open/</guid>
      <description>This is just great:
http://www.avc.com/a_vc/2009/01/redesigning-a-u.html
A summary of the post that basically Bug Labs has hired IDEO to redesign their hardware user interface for BUGbase and to do it in the open.
Updates on the design process can be sees at: Bug Blog, Bug Community, and the IDEO blog.</description>
    </item>
    
  </channel>
</rss>