<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for blog.timc3.com</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.timc3.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.timc3.com</link>
	<description>providing news and views since 2003</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 21:29:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Joining Debian to AD by timc3</title>
		<link>http://blog.timc3.com/2006/07/27/joining-debian-to-ad/comment-page-1/#comment-34914</link>
		<dc:creator>timc3</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 21:29:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.timc3.com/2006/07/27/joining-debian-to-ad/#comment-34914</guid>
		<description>No problem Nick, glad to see that it is still useful.

Hope you and the family are doing well!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No problem Nick, glad to see that it is still useful.</p>
<p>Hope you and the family are doing well!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on psycopg2 OS X &#8211; _PQbackendPID by Daniel</title>
		<link>http://blog.timc3.com/2010/08/20/psycopg2-os-x-_pqbackendpid/comment-page-1/#comment-33920</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 02:43:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.timc3.com/?p=809#comment-33920</guid>
		<description>The not finding gcc-4.0 was fixed for me when I upgraded to Python 2.7.2 (was a problem with 2.7.1).  You should give this a try.  Of course, I&#039;m having another problem so yeah...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The not finding gcc-4.0 was fixed for <a target="_self" href="mailto:tim@nospamplease.timc3.com">me</a> when I upgraded to Python 2.7.2 (was a problem with 2.7.1).  You should give this a try.  Of course, I&#8217;m having another problem so yeah&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Debian SCSI &amp; IDE by vaska</title>
		<link>http://blog.timc3.com/2005/03/28/debian-scsi-ide/comment-page-1/#comment-32538</link>
		<dc:creator>vaska</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Dec 2011 20:26:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-32538</guid>
		<description>Tnx bro, problem solve.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tnx bro, problem solve.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on psycopg2 OS X &#8211; _PQbackendPID by timc3</title>
		<link>http://blog.timc3.com/2010/08/20/psycopg2-os-x-_pqbackendpid/comment-page-1/#comment-32034</link>
		<dc:creator>timc3</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2011 08:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.timc3.com/?p=809#comment-32034</guid>
		<description>Benjamin: Thanks for taking the time to post, unfortunately from what you are saying it sounds like the nightmare continues. I don&#039;t have the need to try and mess around again at this point setting up a new system, but I will try at some point soon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Benjamin: Thanks for taking the time to post, unfortunately from what you are saying it sounds like the nightmare continues. I don&#8217;t have the need to try and mess around again at this point setting up a new system, but I will try at some point soon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Extending Django&#8217;s user admin by timc3</title>
		<link>http://blog.timc3.com/2010/02/18/extending-djangos-user-admin/comment-page-1/#comment-32033</link>
		<dc:creator>timc3</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2011 08:25:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.timc3.com/?p=732#comment-32033</guid>
		<description>SDC: Yes I haven&#039;t tried this with Django 1.3, at the time it was written I think that I was on Django 1.2</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SDC: Yes I haven&#8217;t tried this with Django 1.3, at the time it was written I think that I was on Django 1.2</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Extending Django&#8217;s user admin by timc3</title>
		<link>http://blog.timc3.com/2010/02/18/extending-djangos-user-admin/comment-page-1/#comment-32032</link>
		<dc:creator>timc3</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2011 08:23:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.timc3.com/?p=732#comment-32032</guid>
		<description>imposter: How are the models setup? Do you have a OneToOne relationship with the models, or OneToMany?

I would suggest building more of a custom form where you include the others, but that really does mean more work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>imposter: How are the models setup? Do you have a OneToOne relationship with the models, or OneToMany?</p>
<p>I would suggest building more of a custom form where you include the others, but that really does mean more work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Extending Django&#8217;s user admin by Imposter</title>
		<link>http://blog.timc3.com/2010/02/18/extending-djangos-user-admin/comment-page-1/#comment-31997</link>
		<dc:creator>Imposter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2011 18:39:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.timc3.com/?p=732#comment-31997</guid>
		<description>Thank you for the concise explanation, it definitely got me up and going on a &#039;phase 1&#039; of editing my user via admin.  However, StackedInline seems to expect a one to many type relationship, where one user can have many profiles.  My conclusion is based on the fact that stacked inlines are appended to the bottom of the user form (in a collapsible form, if using grappelli) and I can&#039;t seem to integrate the ProfileUser fields nicely with the user form.  It would be nice to group the ProfileUser forms fields in with the User form fields (Personal Info, Business Info) etc, but Fieldsets seem to have no knowledge of inlines.

Any suggestions?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for the concise explanation, it definitely got <a target="_self" href="mailto:tim@nospamplease.timc3.com">me</a> up and going on a &#8216;phase 1&#8242; of editing my user via admin.  However, StackedInline seems to expect a one to many type relationship, where one user can have many profiles.  My conclusion is based on the fact that stacked inlines are appended to the bottom of the user form (in a collapsible form, if using grappelli) and I can&#8217;t seem to integrate the ProfileUser fields nicely with the user form.  It would be nice to group the ProfileUser forms fields in with the User form fields (Personal Info, Business Info) etc, but Fieldsets seem to have no knowledge of inlines.</p>
<p>Any suggestions?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Extending Django&#8217;s user admin by SDC</title>
		<link>http://blog.timc3.com/2010/02/18/extending-djangos-user-admin/comment-page-1/#comment-31806</link>
		<dc:creator>SDC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Dec 2011 18:58:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.timc3.com/?p=732#comment-31806</guid>
		<description>People of the future:

I get some aggravating &#039;non unique user id errors&#039; with this approach

had to use the answer here
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2813189/django-userprofile-with-unique-foreign-key-in-django-admin


to get it to work

(Django 1.3)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>People of the future:</p>
<p>I get some aggravating &#8216;non unique user id errors&#8217; with this approach</p>
<p>had to use the answer here<br />
<a href="http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2813189/django-userprofile-with-unique-foreign-key-in-django-admin" rel="nofollow">http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2813189/django-userprofile-with-unique-foreign-key-in-django-admin</a></p>
<p>to get it to work</p>
<p>(Django 1.3)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on psycopg2 OS X &#8211; _PQbackendPID by Benjamin</title>
		<link>http://blog.timc3.com/2010/08/20/psycopg2-os-x-_pqbackendpid/comment-page-1/#comment-31679</link>
		<dc:creator>Benjamin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2011 21:03:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.timc3.com/?p=809#comment-31679</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the walkthrough, it me pretty close. Apparently, later versions of XCode come with gcc-4.2 instead of 4.0.  The Setup script looks for 4.0, and not finding it fails.  I&#039;ve googled around but have not found a solution.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the walkthrough, it <a target="_self" href="mailto:tim@nospamplease.timc3.com">me</a> pretty close. Apparently, later versions of XCode come with gcc-4.2 instead of 4.0.  The Setup script looks for 4.0, and not finding it fails.  I&#8217;ve googled around but have not found a solution.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Virtual host QCow convert to LVM by Pravin</title>
		<link>http://blog.timc3.com/2011/05/01/virtual-host-qcow-convert-to-lvm/comment-page-1/#comment-30968</link>
		<dc:creator>Pravin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2011 14:56:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.timc3.com/?p=860#comment-30968</guid>
		<description>Thanks lol...
Below mentioned link is very easy to understand,
http://www.redhatlinux.info/2010/11/lvm-logical-volume-manager.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks lol&#8230;<br />
Below mentioned link is very easy to understand,<br />
<a href="http://www.redhatlinux.info/2010/11/lvm-logical-volume-manager.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.redhatlinux.info/2010/11/lvm-logical-volume-manager.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 9/42 queries in 0.534 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 365/395 objects using disk: basic

Served from: blog.timc3.com @ 2012-02-05 00:27:45 -->
